Hagel: Arms Deal Clear Signal to Iran

            U.S. Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel warned that a $10 billion arms deal with Israel, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates is a “clear signal" that all options are on the table for preventing a nuclear-armed Iran. Hagel arrived in Israel on April 21 for his first visit as defense chief. Defense Minister Moshe Ya’alon and Hagel agreed that economic sanctions and diplomacy should be exhausted before considering a strike.

            Ya’alon emphasized that a “credible military option” is necessary to convince Iran to abandon suspected military dimensions of its nuclear program. “[W]e keep our right and capabilities to defend ourselves by ourselves,” he warned. Hagel acknowledged Israel’s right to defend itself and make its own calculations. He spent three days in Israel before heading to Jordan, Egypt, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates. The following are excerpted remarks by Hagel and top Israeli officials.
 
Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel
            “[A]ll military options and every option must remain on the table in dealing with Iran.  That's been a consistent position of mine, regardless of the positions I've held as United States senator and civilian. 
            I support the president's position on Iran. And it's very simple. And I have stated it here, and I've said it many times, as the president has. Our position is, Iran will not be allowed to develop a nuclear weapon, the prevention of Iran from developing a nuclear weapon, period…”
[R]egarding your point about whether Israel should strike Iran, as I said on that trip over here, Israel is a sovereign nation.  Every sovereign nation has a right to defend itself.  That calculation has to be made by the sovereign nation. 
            As to your question regarding any minor disagreements about timing, what I was referring to is intelligence agencies always are within ranges of their positions based on measurement of intelligence on all issues. And that doesn't necessarily always come out exactly the same way or in the same time schedule. 
            But I also believe I said that there was no question about our intelligence agencies working very clearly and closely together on this issue, and we are not only in complete agreement on the policy about Iran, but also we are in total agreement on -- if a time should get to a point here, where we will then have to develop other strategies or other options, and I don't think there's any daylight there or any gap…
            Well, the sanctions on Iran are, I believe, as potent and deep and wide set of international sanctions that we've ever seen on any country.  And those will continue to increase, but I -- I believe -- and there's a rather significant metrics and measurements that give you this information, that those sanctions are causing a tremendous amount of difficulty for Iran. 
            It is the policy of the United States that -- and many of our allies -- to work many tracks in dealing with Iran, and certainly international sanctions are one.  And they are having an effect. Whether it leads to an outcome that we desire remains to be seen. 
            But in any event, that's why you use all the different tools that nations have working together. And as I said, the military option is always an option, and it is always on the table…” April 22, at a joint press conference with Defense Minister Ya’alon
 
            “Israel and the United States see the threat of Iran exactly the same as do many other countries, not just in the Middle East.  So I don't think there's any daylight there. 
            When you break down into the specifics of -- of the timing of when and if Iran decides to pursue a nuclear weapon, there may well be some differences, but our -- generally -- and, again, I can't speak for General Clapper -- I believe our intelligence is -- is generally pretty close to each other, as well as other intelligence agencies. 
            But the bottom line is that Iran is a threat.  It's a real threat.  And the United States' policy has been very clear on this.  And I think everyone knows it.  As other nations, the -- the Iranians must be prevented from developing that capacity to build a nuclear weapon and deliver it.  And you work out from there…
            I think the United States' course of action, as well as other nations' in the P5-plus-one and many others, working many tracks with Iran, the diplomatic track, the economic sanctions track.  I mean, if you stop just for a moment and look at the U.N. sanctions, international sanctions on Iran, I don't know of an international regime of sanctions that have been more effective, have been more unified and tougher than what's being applied to Iran.
            We know through many measurements that those sanctions are hurting Iran significantly.  Now, does that assure that Iran is brought to a bargaining table or Iran would give up the possibility of achieving a goal of -- if that's their goal?  And I'm not certain we know that, that that decision's been made alone, maybe not.  
            But I think we look at all the dynamics in play and use all the tracks.  I've said, the president's said, all the leaders of the last couple of administrations have said that the military option is -- is one option that remains on the table, must remain on the table.  So we've never taken an option off the table, but military options, I think most of us feel, should be the last option. 
            If that is an option that's required, then we'll have to make that decision, but I think it's our sense, the United States and many of our allies, that these other tracks do have some time to continue to try to influence the outcome in Iran. 
            There's an election coming up in June in Iran.  No one can predict how that might affect the further direction of Iran in policy.  So I think our policy is the correct policy.  Certainly, Israel has every right and responsibility to make their own assessments, but we're working very closely and will continue to work very closely with Israel…
          I don't think there's any question that that's [the arms deal under negotiation] another very clear signal to Iran.  But I think that signal and that reality and that policy has been very clear to Iran for some time.  But this -- this new set of military capabilities to Israel is not new in the sense that it has been the policy of the United States to continue to enhance the military qualitative edge for Israel.  And so this just continues that policy and -- and that dimension...
            When I said that Iran is a real threat, it isn't just the potential of being a nuclear threat.  Iran is a state sponsor of terrorism.  That in itself is a threat to not just the region, but to our interests in -- in the region and around the world.  When you further expand that threat to the possibility of acquiring nuclear weapons, it becomes pretty clear the dimension of the threat…” April 21, to the media enroute to Israel
 
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu
              “Israel appreciates deeply, the support, the military and security support, that it enjoys from the United States – it reflects a very deep alliance between our two countries and the defense of our common interests and our common values.
            Nowhere are these values and interests challenged more than by the arming of terrorist groups by Iran with sophisticated weapons, and equally, Iran’s attempt to arm itself with nuclear weapons. This is a challenge that Israel cannot accept, and as you and President Obama have repeatedly said, Israel must be able to defend itself, by itself, against any threat. In any case, it is good to have you in Jerusalem.  It is good to have the support, friendship and alliance of the United States.  We deeply appreciate it.” April 23, at a meeting with Hagel  
 
Defense Minister Moshe Ya’alon
            “The United States and Israel face common threats and challenges in our tough neighborhood, the Middle East, above all from Iran
            Iran not only threatens the security and stability of the Middle East, but of the entire world.  Iran threatens to wipe Israel off the map.  It backs Hezbollah in Lebanon and Hamas in Gaza.  And it is assisting the Syrian regime to kill tens of thousands of innocent civilians.  Iranian regime is involved in Afghanistan, Iraq, Yemen, Sudan, and more.  And Iran is developing nuclear weapons…
            But without a credible military option, there is no chance that the Iranian regime will realize that he has to stop the military nuclear project.  And in certain circumstances, the military option should be exercised.  So this is our very clear policy.  And, of course, we keep our right and capabilities to defend ourselves by ourselves.” April 22, at a joint press conference with Hagel
 
President Shimon Peres
            “The Iranian people are going to have elections very soon.  I try to understand what do they want.  Iran doesn't have a single enemy.  Nobody threatened Iran.  Why did their leaders decide to become a threat to others?  
            It's hard to understand because they don't need neither any sort of weapons.  And if I were an Iranian, I would really try to see that our children are having enough food for breakfast and young people have an occasion to be educated and live in peace.  
            What's wrong with peace?  Even if peace is not enriched uranium -- you know, you can make anything even without enriched uranium if nobody is threatening you. 
            And I think from that point of view, your visit is timely and meaningful.  It is not just to pay a visit in this country.  But it means that the message coming from you is that you are determined, as really a leader of the free world, not to permit Iran to make this terrible mistake and become nuclear. 
            If it can be achieved by diplomatic means, the better.  Otherwise, they must know that just by diplomacy, it will not be forgiven.  And the president spoke very clearly.  I was watching your interview now on the television.  You said actually the same thing. 
            And I have the full trust in your position, in your seriousness, because, really, Israelis understand that Iran is not just a threat to Israel.  It's really a threat to the peace in the world, for no reason whatsoever.  The world doesn't threaten Iran. 
            And it's a message, don't wait.  You have a choice.  You don't show animosity to Iran.  You simply tell them not to make the Middle East a terrible place of threats and the mass destruction weapons.  You can see what's happening now in Syria…
            We can and we should help other people to overcome their existential problems without going into politics or religion.  And we can prevent the Iranians from making themself a catastrophe for their own sake and for the rest of the world.” April 22, to the media with Hagel