United States Institute of Peace

The Iran Primer

Iran Primer's Blog

Latest on the Race: Rafsanjani on the Issues

      Former President Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani has been a pivotal player in Iranian politics since the 1979 Islamic revolution. His views have often adapted to the times, issue or public sentiment. But he has often argued that “moderation” and national unity could help Iran overcome domestic challenges as well as repair its relations with the outside world. The following are excerpts from various interviews, public remarks and campaign materials.

 
 
Iran’s Theocratic System
            “We should live based on Islamic laws and not based on radical individuals' interpretations which sometimes make people's lives difficult.” May 2005 to journalists
            “According to the constitution, everything in the country is determined by people's vote. People elect the members of the Assembly of Expert and then they elect leader, so the leader is [indirectly] elected by people's vote. Presidents, MPs, members of the councils are elected by direct votes of people. Other officials are also appointed [indirectly] through people's vote. Everything depends on people. This is the religious system. The title of Islamic Republic is not used as a formality. It includes both the republican and Islamic nature… This is a reality passed on to us on the basis of Koran, as well as the religious sayings of the [Shiite] Imams and prophet… Rest assured, if one of those two aspects are damaged we will lose our revolution.” July 17, 2009 in a sermon according to BBC Monitoring
 
His political career
            “I entered the 2013 race to perform my religious and national duty given the country's situation … and its problems at home and abroad… Certain people and movements have resorted to lying and falsification and slurs to discredit others. These people, intentionally or unintentionally, are harming the Islamic revolution.” May 16, 2013 to Tehran University students
            I have “been with the revolution second-by-second from the very beginning of the struggle, which was begun by our leader Imam [Khomeini]. We are talking about 60 years ago. I know what the Imam wanted.” July 17, 2009 in a sermon according to BBC Monitoring
 
Factional Politics and the 2009 Election
            “I have never wanted to abuse this platform in favor of a particular faction, and my remarks have always concerned issues beyond factionalism… I am not interested in any factions. In my view, we should all think and find a way that will unite us to take our country forward and save ourselves from these dangerous effects and the emerging grudges…” July 17, 2009 in a sermon according to BBC Monitoring
 
Economy
            “The income resulting from restructuring subsidies was supposed to be reinvested in the manufacturing and agricultural sectors, but these sectors have not received adequate support… Rising economic problems threaten the future of the country like an awesome avalanche.” January 2012 in a meeting with the Agricultural Council, according to ISNA
            Subsidy reform (under President Ahmadinejad) led to an “insignificant amount of cash distributed to the population in exchange for alarming inflation… People are feeling the multiplication of prices and the drop of the currency’s value with their flesh and blood… Yet some are content with their imaginary statistics.” February 20, 2013 according to Donya-e-Eqtesad
 
United States and the West
            “Several times when I was the president I mentioned that if the United States showed goodwill we would enter a dialogue with it. And I gave this directive to the Americans, that freeing our assets in the United States would be a sign of goodwill…They admitted the shah (for medical treatment after he fled Iran). They started it…”February 6, 2005 in an interview with USA Today
            “There is no doubt that America is a superpower of the world, and we cannot ignore it…Americans should gradually begin to adopt positive behavior rather than doing evil. [But] they should not expect an immediate reaction in return for their positive measures. It will take time. ” May 2005 to journalists, according to Reuters
            “I believe the main solution is to gain the trust of Europe and America and to remove their concerns over the peaceful nature of our nuclear industry and to assure them that there will never be a diversion" to military use.  May 2005 to journalists
            “Americans are using sanctions and pressure. In the negotiations, they also have the upper hand… Now, if we sit down with them to negotiate, they say, ‘You do this, and then we stop some sanctions.’ But this is not negotiations.” May 2012 in an interview with Jomhouri Eslami translated by PBS
            “Our country should be united against all the dangers that threaten us. They [Western countries] have now upped their ransom demands and are coming forward to take away our achievements in the fields of hi-tech and particularly nuclear technology. Of course, God will not give them the opportunity to do so, but they are greedy…” July 17, 2009 in a sermon according to BBC Monitoring
 
Nuclear Energy Program
            Nuclear energy “is our nation’s legitimate right ... especially when it is in accordance with international laws and regulations.” May 18, 2005 to journalists
            “If one day the Islamic world is also equipped with weapons like those that Israel possesses now, then the imperialists' strategy will reach a standstill because the use of even one nuclear bomb inside Israel will destroy everything. However, it will only harm the Islamic world…” December 14, 2001 in a speech on Jerusalem Day according to the BBC
 
Israel and Palestinian Issue
            “We are not at war with Israel. If the Arab countries are at war with them, we’ll help them.” April 2013 to reporters according to Mehr News
            We want all the Palestinians back in their homeland, and then there can be a fair referendum for people to choose the form of state they want... Whoever gets the majority can rule.” October 29, 2005 at a Jerusalem Day rally according to The Washington Post
            “The Palestinian issue, and the formation of the state of Israel, are among the worst periods of our contemporary history. I don't know of any similar tragedy. In the 50 years since this pseudo-state was formed, and in the several decades before it when fighting was going on, hundreds of thousands of holy people shed their blood… Tragedies resulting from these events constitute the greatest encyclopedia of crime committed by the World Arrogance [United States].” December 14, 2001 in a speech on Jerusalem Day according to the BBC
 
Media Freedom
            “We should not limit our media, which has legal permission for their activities. They should be able to work within the framework of the laws…The media should not expect to engage in activities beyond the legal framework, nor should the establishment expect them to ignore their legal rights…Our officials, law enforcement, military and security forces should help to create that atmosphere.” In a July 17, 2009 sermon according to BBC Monitoring
            “We see that a Facebook page costing nothing can outstrip several television and radio outlets, and can influence millions of people… This, in my opinion, is a blessing… We see that if social media did not exist, movements against tyranny and oppression would be endangered.” May 29, 2013 according to ISNA via AFP
 
 

U.S. Report on Iran Religious Freedom Abuses

            Iran’s government reportedly imprisoned, harassed and discriminated against more people for their religious beliefs in 2012 than in the past, according to a new report by the U.S. State Department. It notes an increase in reports of the government charging religious and ethnic minorities with enmity against God, “anti-Islamic propaganda,” or vague national security crimes related to religion. “All religious minorities suffered varying degrees of officially sanctioned discrimination, particularly in the areas of employment, education, and housing,” according to the 2012 International Religious Freedom Report. The following are excerpts, followed by a link to the full text on Iran.

Government Practices
            There were reports of abuses of religious freedom, including imprisonment and detention. The government severely restricted religious freedom. Reports of government imprisonment, harassment, intimidation, and discrimination based on religious beliefs continued. Government rhetoric and actions created an increasingly threatening atmosphere for nearly all non-Shia religious groups, most notably for Bahais, as well as for Sunni Muslims including Sufis, evangelical Christians, Jews, and Shia groups that did not share the government’s religious views. Government-controlled broadcast and print media continued negative campaigns against religious minorities, particularly against Bahais. All non-Shia religious minorities suffered varying degrees of officially sanctioned discrimination, especially in employment, education, and housing.
            The government continued to increase convictions and executions of dissidents, political reformists, and peaceful protesters on the charge of moharebeh (enmity against God) and anti-Islamic propaganda. The government executed at least ten individuals on charges of moharebeh, according to credible NGO reports. In June authorities executed four ethnic Arabs from the Ahvaz region who had been arrested in April 2011 during a protest in Khuzestan and convicted of moharebeh and fasad-fil arz (“corruption on earth”). The authorities reportedly executed at least six Salafi Kurds on December 27 on charges of “membership in Salafi groups” and “participation in terrorist acts.”
            Christian pastor Youcef Nadarkhani remained in jail at year’s end, after a series of government actions including a brief release from imprisonment… Officials reportedly pressured Nadarkhani to renounce his Christian faith throughout his ordeal and offered leniency if he would do so…
            Christian pastor and dual U.S.-Iranian national, Saeed Abedini, was put under house arrest in July on charges of undermining national security by leading a network of house churches. In September, Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps officials raided his residence and took him to Evin Prison, where he remained in detention at year’s end. Abedini was reportedly subjected to physical and psychological abuse by Iranian authorities. Iranian officials have denied him consular access and necessary medical care…
 
Status of Societal Respect for Religious Freedom
            There were reports of societal abuses or discrimination based on religious affiliation, belief, or practice. Although the constitution gave Christians, Jews, and Zoroastrians the status of “protected” religious minorities, in practice non-Muslims faced substantial societal discrimination, and government actions continued to support elements of society that created a threatening atmosphere for them. Many reports from human rights organizations and international organizations during the year asserted that societal abuses or actions stemmed from government actions or encouragement.
            The conservative media continued its campaign against non-Muslim religious minorities, begun after President Ahmadinejad took office in August 2005. Political and religious leaders continued to issue a stream of inflammatory statements against non-Muslims. These campaigns contributed to a significantly poorer situation for the non-Muslim community throughout the year…
 
U.S. Government Policy
            Since 1999 the United States has designated Iran as a “Country of Particular Concern” (CPC) under the International Religious Freedom Act for having engaged in or tolerated particularly severe violations of religious freedom. In August 2011 the secretary of state redesignated Iran as a CPC, and redesignated the existing restrictions on certain imports from and exports to the country, in accordance with section 103(b) of the Comprehensive Iran Sanctions Accountability and Divestment Act of 2010, pursuant to section 402(c)(5) of the act.
            The United States has no diplomatic relations with Iran, and thus did not directly raise concerns with the government over its religious freedom abuses and restrictions. However, the U.S. government made its position clear through public statements and reports, support for relevant UN and NGO efforts, diplomatic initiatives, and sanctions as it pressed for an end to government abuses. On numerous occasions U.S. government officials, including the ambassador at large for international religious freedom, addressed the situations of Bahai, Christian, Jewish, and other communities in the country…
 
Click here for the Iran section.
 

Latest on the Race: Jalili on the Issues

      Chief nuclear negotiator Saeed Jalili is a major conservative candidate for Iran’s presidency. The secretary of the Supreme National Security Council seems to share the supreme leader’s hardline outlook on all key issues. The following are excerpts from various interviews, public remarks and campaign materials.
 
 
Nuclear Energy Program
            “We are against the proliferation of nuclear weapons. The serious question today is which country has supplied Israel with nuclear arms. This is a serious question that needs to be addressed internationally.” February 4, 2013 at a press conference in Damascus
            “Uranium enrichment is one of these rights that every individual member state [of the Non-Proliferation Treaty] should benefit from and enjoy for peaceful purposes... Talks should be based on confidence-building measures, which would build the confidence of Iranians.” April 14, 2012 at a press conference in Istanbul after negotiations
            “The strategy of pressure is wrong and could not bring any results.” February 2013 in an interview with The Christian Science Monitor
            “The IAEA [U.N. nuclear watchdog] said they didn't find one document showing any diversion from our peaceful program. Some of the great powers know this and they have made clear that they didn't want confidence building - they just want to deprive Iran of its inalienable rights.” December 18, 2006 in an interview with the Boston Globe
            “We believe that the right to enrich is an inalienable right of the Iranian people ― whether we are talking about [to a level of] five percent or 20 percent.” April 6, 2013 according to AFP
            “Those who have focused on the issue of uranium enriched to 20 percent [purity] should be accountable today and answer why they refused to give it to us when we told them we did not want to produce it and asked them to sell it to us for peaceful purposes.” May 16, 2013 in an interview with the Financial Times
 
Economy
            “Those who feel they can pressure the Iranian people through sanctions, are playing in our field; because this act allows for an enhanced Islamic Republic… That which is coming to an end is pressure placed on the Iranian people, for without doubt, difficulties result in further resistance and growth.” May 17, 2012 at a conference on Iran’s economy
            “At least over the past few years when I have been carefully following the effects of sanctions, I see that they can be easily bypassed and turned into opportunities.” May 16, 2013 in an interview with the Financial Times
            “Increasing privatization should not be limited to state supervision and authority.” In undated comments on his campaign website
 
United States
            “To serve its interests, not only does the United States violate the rights of others, but also violates its claims about democracy and free trade by meddling in the internal affairs of other countries and the imposition of unilateral sanctions.” January 2, 2013 during an official visit to India
            “The Iranian nation’s behavior over the past 34 years shows that the US cannot do whatever it wants. The US seriously opposed Iran’s nuclear program when they thought they had no rival in the world. But then they said they were seeking international consensus, but that did not succeed, either... We have never waited to see what US conditions for [direct] talks are. The problem is America’s behaviour. It has to change.”May 16, 2013 in an interview with the Financial Times
            “The United States uses terror as a means for achieving its evil goals… The Islamic revolution of 1978 emerged at a time when the United States had looted the nation’s assets and sought to dominate its minds.” November 4, 2011 at an event marking the anniversary of the U.S. Embassy takeover
 
Foreign Affairs
            “The Islamic Revolution model can be reproduced everywhere... If all the powers of the [global] south are connected to pool their power, a great power will be added to the superpowers.” In undated comments on his campaign website
           
Syria
            “How could Assad have lasted this long? Isn't it because he's leaning on popular support? We're not saying that no one is opposed to him. But at the end of the day the will of the people is with him.”August 2012 in an interview with Al Mayadeen television
            “Terrorists have never brought democracy to nations… The present dilemma in Syria is that outsiders have disguised their illegitimate demands as public demands, and are trying to abuse the ongoing crisis in a bid to implement their colonial and interventionist policies.” August 9, 2012 in a meeting with Iraqi Foreign Minister Hoshyar Zebari in Baghdad
            “We’ve said from the outset of the Syrian crisis that the only thing that can help resolve the crisis is national dialogue in Syria… We’ve said that terrorism, violent behavior and killing innocent people cannot be steps toward defending the rights of the Syrian people.” February 4, 2013 at a press conference in Damascus
            “The [Israeli] attack exposes the aggressive nature of the regime and its threat to regional security and stability… Enemies claim to defend and support the Syrian nation on the one hand and continue to hatch plots against it on the other hand.” February 2, 2013 in a meeting with Syrian Prime Minister Wael al Halqi in Damascus
            “Once Kofi Annan asked me what is your idea on resolving the problem in Syria. I said: It is only one word: Democracy.” May 13, 2013 via Twitter
 
Arab Uprisings
            “The Islamic Awakening has created a great opportunity, and it is only natural that the enemies of peace and stability in the region and the enemies of the Islamic Ummah [community] are not pleased with this situation.” August 6, 2012 in Beirut
            “The United States and Europe must be answerable to the Egyptian people for supporting a dictatorship for 30 years… The victory of the Egyptian Revolution coinciding with the victory of Iran's Islamic Revolution proved that 22 Bahman [February 11] is the day of triumph for regional nations and is the day of defeat for the United States and the Zionist regime.” Feb. 11, 2011 in an interview with Press TV
            “Fortunately, the Islamic thinkers' theory that says Islam is the sole political solution to save the Islamic Ummah has materialized…” July 2012 at a meeting with a Tunisian lawmaker in Tehran
 
Palestinian Issue
            “Palestine belongs to the entire world of Islam and should be liberated.” May 12, 2012 in a meeting with Hamas Foreign Minister Mohamed Awad in Tehran
           “Resistance for the liberation of Palestinian lands is the best axis for unity of Islamic nation and could be used as a preventive strategy in deterring the enemy’s divisive plots.” March 3, 2013 in a meeting with Hamas deputy chief Mousa Abu Marzouq in Tehran
 
Islam and Religion
            “Some say religion is only personal rituals, some say religion is for society. We say religion is for all.” May 13, 2013 via Twitter
            “Islamic thought has powerfully withstood against Western doctrines.” November 4, 2011 at an event marking the anniversary of the U.S. Embassy takeover
 
Israel
            Israel “will regret its attack on Syria, just like it regretted its war on Gaza and Lebanon… Iran will use its power in the [U.N.] Security Council to support Syria against Israel.” February 4, 2013 to the press in Damascus
            “The world community must steadfastly attend to the Zionist nuclear weapon issue… and must be determined to contain proliferation…” February 2013 according to The Young Journalists Club
 
 

 

Top US Officials on Sanctions Impact

            On May 15, two top officials in the Obama administration claimed U.S. sanctions are having a growing impact on the Iranian economy, the regime’s political calculations and Tehran’s foreign policy. The following are excerpts from the testimony of Under Secretary of the Treasury David S. Cohen and Undersecretary of State Wendy Sherman before the House Foreign Affairs Subcommittee.
 
Secretary of the Treasury David S. Cohen
            Since my last appearance before this Committee, the scope, intensity, and impact of U.S. sanctions on Iran have expanded through the enactment of legislation, the adoption of executive orders, and the energetic implementation and enforcement of the entire sanctions framework.  These efforts have heightened the economic pressure and imposed a very significant strain on the Iranian regime…
 
Petroleum Sector Impacts
            U.S. and EU sanctions on Iran’s petroleum sector have been particularly powerful… Iran’s crude oil and condensate exports have dropped by roughly 1.3 million barrels per day, or some 50%, between the enactment of the NDAA and early 2013.  The EU’s decision to ban the import of oil into Europe, effective in mid-2012, contributed in no small part to this fall.  These lost sales cost Iran between $3 billion and $5 billion a month.  Iran’s petrochemical exports have also been hit, decreasing by at least 7.6 percent in 2012 from the previous year… 
 
Economic Impacts
            As Iran finds it increasingly difficult to earn revenue from petroleum sales and to conduct international financial transactions, Iran’s economy has been severely weakened.  Iran’s own economic mismanagement has only exacerbated these effects… 
            Treasury assesses that in 2012 Iran’s GDP fell by some 5 to 8 percent – the largest drop since 1988, the final year of the Iran-Iraq war, and the first contraction in twenty years.  This decline has impacted the Government of Iran’s budget, causing it to run in 2012 its largest deficit in 14 years, which could amount to some 3 percent of GDP.  We believe Iran’s GDP will continue to shrink in 2013 in the face of reduced government and consumer spending and declining oil exports, as well as the ramping up of additional sanctions. Iran’s economic contraction is manifest in its recent budget bill, which projects almost 40 percent less oil revenue than did the previous year’s budget law.  To help make up the shortfall, Iran’s parliament is currently considering tax increases of some 38 percent.  And in March, Iran’s Supreme Audit Court released figures showing that for the first nine months of the Iranian year only 53 percent of projected budget revenues had been realized.  
            We have also begun to see the impact of the bilateral trade restriction...  This measure has limited Iran’s access to its foreign exchange reserves and impeded the Government of Iran’s ability to support the rial.  Supported by our extensive outreach efforts, this powerful provision is rendering Iran’s reserves increasingly inaccessible. 
            Iran’s currency also has been hit hard.  At the beginning of 2012, one U.S. dollar purchased 16,000 rials in the open market.  As of April 30 of this year, one dollar was worth about 36,000 rials.The open market value of the rial has lost over two-thirds of its value in the last two years.
            Faced with a rapidly depreciating rial, in September 2012 the Central Bank of Iran established a Currency Trading Center (CTC) to allocate foreign exchange for certain preferred imports at a preferential rate of about 24,000 rials to the dollar.  Apparently faced with dwindling supplies of hard currency, just a few weeks ago the Central Bank of Iran substantially limited the list of imported goods that qualified for the CTC’s preferential rate.  
            Inflation, partly due to the volatility and depreciation of the rial, is another telling metric.  As of April 20, 2013, the official Statistics Center of Iran twelve-month average inflation rate was approximately 30 percent, while the point-to-point inflation rate was nearly 39 percent.  Independent analysis suggests the actual inflation rate is significantly higher.  
            These figures become increasingly stark when we compare Iran to its neighbors or similarly situated countries.  Compared to groupings of countries in the Middle East and Africa, Iran’s stock of foreign capital, as measured by the Bank of International Settlements, is down 57 percent for the two-year period ending December 2012, representing a reduction in lending of some $9.5 billion.  This figure contrasts with a 13 percent increase in BIS banks’ lending exposure to all developing countries.   (See Chart 2, appended.)  This shortage of capital is at least one reason why Iran’s automobile sector is now encountering significant difficulties, manufacturing at some 50 percent of nominal capacity and facing substantially reduced exports.  
 
Claimed Impact on Humanitarian Trade
            There have been some reports of shortages of some medicines in Iran, and that some banks may be reluctant to process payments for the export of pharmaceuticals and other humanitarian goods to Iran.  At the same time, however, we have also been told by major pharmaceutical companies that they are able to deliver their products to Iran and receive payment.
            Regardless of this discrepancy, we take this issue very seriously.  President Obama has made clear that we have nothing but respect for the people of Iran.  The goal of our sanctions on Iran is to expose and impede the Iranian government’s continued pursuit of its nuclear and ballistic missile programs, and to help persuade the Iranian leadership that its only viable choice is to come into compliance with its international obligations.  
            That is why it has been the longstanding policy of the United States to allow the export to Iran of humanitarian items, such as food, medicine, and medical devices.  Our sanctions broadly authorize the sale and export to Iran of nearly all types of food and medicines, as well as basic medical supplies.  No special permission is required to sell these humanitarian goods to Iran. And foreign financial institutions can facilitate these permissible humanitarian transactions, as long as the transaction does not involve a U.S.-designated entity, such as a bank sanctioned for supporting Iran’s nuclear program. 
            To allay any concerns or misunderstandings, several months ago Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) published detailed guidance clarifying our long-standing policies regarding humanitarian assistance and related exports to the Iranian people… 
            Despite our efforts to isolate and pressure Iran, we know there is far more to do.  
            As Secretary Lew has said, “We will exhaust all diplomatic and economic means we can.”  What remains to be seen, he noted, is whether this will “change the mind of the regime so that it [is] ready to, in a diplomatic process, give up the pursuit of nuclear weapons.  That is the goal.” 
 
Undersecretary of State Wendy Sherman
            Iran’s leaders want the world to think of their country as a legitimate power and a regional leader. Yet, the costly and destructive decisions the regime is making day after day undermine Iran as a credible player on the world stage.  What’s more, Iran’s policies—from its nuclear weapons ambitions, to its destabilizing regional activities, to its abysmal record on human rights—create a range of challenges to the United States and every country committed to peace and stability.
            The Obama Administration takes every single one of these challenges seriously.  We know that our success depends on effective collaboration here in Washington and with our allies and partners around the world.  We’re pursuing a number of avenues to deal with Iran: resolutions and other actions at the United Nations, the Human Rights Council, the IAEA, and other multilateral organizations… wide ranging sanctions… ensuring we have the appropriate force posture…leveraging bilateral relationships to raise a red flag when Iran seeks to open up a new Embassy … and engaging the Iranian people through virtual diplomacy.  Every day, every bureau in the State Department has their eye on Iran. We’re making clear that Iran’s international legitimacy and the end to their isolation depends on the choice Iran’s leaders are facing right now: change course, or continue to pay the cost of intransigence…
            We’ve put in place a dual-track policy of ratcheting up pressure in the form of sanctions and other measures while pursuing a diplomatic solution.
            The sanctions have hit the Iranian economy hard.  Iran’s crude exports have plummeted, costing Iran 3-5 billion dollars per month; the rial has depreciated more than 50% over the past 12 months; and official inflation is at 32.2 percent, although informal estimates are significantly higher. Even with the sanctions in place, we’re making sure that humanitarian trade continues so that the Iranian people aren’t facing terrible hardship.
            At the same time, we and our P5+1 partners are pushing for a diplomatic solution…
            We are clear eyed in our approach to the P5+1 talks and seek concrete results. After all, while the window for negotiation is still open, it will not remain so forever.  We will give diplomacy every chance to succeed.  But ultimately, the onus is on Iran.
            Beyond Iran’s nuclear ambitions, we’re also concerned about the destabilizing influence Iran is casting across the entire Middle East and beyond.  Support to the Asad regime—their closest ally—is sustaining the campaign of violence against the Syrian people.  Their aid to terrorist organizations is threatening our ally Israel and innocent civilians worldwide. 
            That’s why we’re deepening our military partnerships across the region, particularly with Israel and the Gulf, to defend against attacks from the very groups supported by Iran’s leaders…
            And of course, we are deeply concerned about the campaign of repression Iran’s rulers are waging against their own people.  Abuse of those who speak out against their government, and harassment of their families.  Students, lawyers, journalists, and bloggers facing endless intimidation, discrimination, and incarceration.  Desperate and vital voices—whether in a town square or on a Twitter feed—stifled and punished.
            Over nearly five thousand years, Persian civilization has given the world innovations in culture, art, medicine, and government.  But today, that historic greatness has been set back.  The limitless potential of Iran’s people has been stifled.  As President Obama said in his Norwuz message, all nations would benefit from the talents and creativity of the Iranian people, especially its youth.  Every day that Iran is isolated from the international community is a day we’re not working together, building together, sharing history and learning about one another. Today, the U.S. and Iranian national wrestling teams are facing off at Madison Square Garden in the sort of people-to-people exchange that can be important to building relationships with other countries and cultures.  But sadly, this show of healthy competition and good sportsmanship is an exception…
            We are closely watching the upcoming election.  Four years ago, the Iranian people spoke out for human rights, basic dignity, and greater opportunity.  The regime responded by shooting demonstrators in the streets and frightening families in their homes…

            We take no sides in the election, but we know that the desires and aspirations of the Iranian people must start with free, fair, and transparent elections...


 

Latest on the Race: Heir Apparent Esfandiar Mashaei

Kourosh Rahimkhani

      Although never elected to office, Esfandiar Rahim Mashaei has become a major political figure as chief of staff to President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. He is also one of Iran’s most controversial politicians. Ahmadinejad appointed him vice-president in 2009, but the political backlash and opposition from Iran’s supreme leader forced him to resign within days.
      In May 2013, Mashaei was one of more than 500 candidates who registered to run for the presidency. He is widely viewed as Ahmadinejad’s political heir—and an attempt to keep the faction in power. The two men are also related by marriage. In 2008, Mashaei’s daughter married Ahmadinejad’s oldest son. Kourosh Rahamkhani profiles Mashaei.
 
Does Mashaei have a base of support among the general population?
            Mashaei shares several characteristics with a new generation of political elites. Most were born in villages and small towns. They were young during the 1979 revolution. They have not emerged from the traditional conservative establishment. Many have backgrounds in the Revolutionary Guards or security forces, fostering a “military-security” political class. Finally, few have so far held elected office. But it is difficult to assess how much appeal Mashaei has among the general population. Some of the president’s allies are concerned that Mashaei’s rhetoric has the potential to become popular.

How is Mashaei perceived among Iran’s political elite?
            Mashaei’s statements have provoked the clerical establishment in the holy city of Qom as well as traditional conservatives in the regime. In 2007, Mashaei—then the vice president and head of the Cultural Heritage Organization—angered top clerics and politicians by attending an event in Turkey where women performed a traditional dance. In 2008, he hosted a ceremony in which some women played tambourines and others carried Korans. “It is people who do not understand music who say it is haram [forbidden by Islamic law],” he said.
            He has also sparked controversies over statements about everything from Biblical history to foreign affairs. If the Prophet Noah “had had good managerial skills, other prophets would not have appeared after him,” he reportedly said. He also pronounced, “Without Iran, Islam would be lost.” On current events, he once said, “Iranians are friends of Israelis.”
            His daring comments and actions have pushed the envelope of the Islamic Republic’s officially sanctioned values. Many clerics consider his remarks on religious affairs to be encroaching on their territory and dismissing them as uninformed or even heretical.
            Even fervent supporters of Ahmadinejad have criticized Mashaei. Hardline cleric Ayatollah Mohammad-Taqi Mesbah-Yazdi branded Mashaei’s statements “erroneous and inappropriate.” In 2009, the supreme leader’s representative on the hardline newspaper Keyhan accused Mashaei of being an agent of the “velvet revolution.” General Hassan Firouzabadi, head of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, denounced Mashaei’s remarks as a “deviation” that undermined national security and against the principles of the Islamic Republic.
 
What is his background?
            Esfandiar Rahim Mashaei was born in 1960 in a northern Iranian village. He participated in his town’s revolutionary rallies as an 18-year-old and studied electrical engineering at Isfahan University after the revolution. In 1981, Mashaei joined the Revolutionary Guards intelligence unit after the Mujahedeen-e Khalq instigated an armed campaign against the Iranian government during the Iran-Iraq War. He was later dispatched to Kurdistan, where Kurdish militants were battling forces loyal to the newly formed Islamic Republic. Mashaei championed a cultural-propaganda campaign, rather than a purely coercive counterinsurgency, to deal with the Kurds.
            In 1984, Mashaei joined the Intelligence Ministry in Kurdistan, where he met Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, then governor of the northwestern city of Khoy. The two men developed a close friendship that has endured almost three decades.
            In 1986, Mashaei was appointed director of an Intelligence Ministry department that dealt with ethnic issues in sensitive regions. He left Kurdistan to help formulate a national strategy. In 1993, he became head of the Interior Ministry’s Social Affairs Department under President Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani.  After the 1997 victory of reformist President Mohammad Khatami, Mashaei left the Interior Ministry and worked for state radio, which is under the direct control of the supreme leader.
            In 2003, Mashaei joined the staff of Tehran’s new mayor, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, after he was selected by the conservative municipal council. He headed the city’s cultural-artistic affairs organization. Among his controversial initiatives, Mashaei proposed building a major thoroughfare to prepare for the arrival of the twelfth Shiite Imam—the Mahdi or “Hidden Imam”—who disappeared in the ninth century. The Mahdi will return as a messiah as the world comes to an end, according to Shiite eschatology.
            After Ahmadinejad was elected president in 2005, Mashaei became a major player in his cabinet, serving as the president’s chief of staff. They also now have family ties. In 2008, Mashaei’s daughter married Ahmadinejad’s oldest son.
 
What role has Mashaei played in Iranian politics?
            Under Ahmadinejad’s patronage, Mashaei has gained more influence in the cabinet, and many see him as the president’s second-in-command. But since 2005, he has also emerged as one of the most controversial figures in the Iranian government. He has been at the center of internal battles between Ahmadinejad’s circle and conservatives known as principlists, who feel the president is veering from the revolution’s early principles.
            Mashaei has held other key positions on both domestic and foreign affairs. Besides chief of staff, he has been the president’s adviser for Middle Eastern affairs; vice president of the High Council of Iranian Affairs Abroad; and the secretary of the administration’s cultural committee.
            Mashaei is often blamed for formulating apocalyptic and religious-nationalistic themes prominent in Ahmadinejad’s rhetoric. Ahmadinejad has urged Iranians to actively pave the way for the coming of the Mahdi. The two themes have been widely viewed as an attempt to build a new constituency among the young and the poor. Ahmadinejad’s messianic interpretation differs from popular Shiite mythology and diminishes the role of Shiite clerics.
            As clerics are falling out of favor in Iranian politics, Ahmadinejad’s opponents are concerned that his rhetoric of “principlists minus the clergy” will become more popular and enhance hardliners around the president.
 
President Ahmadinejad appointed Mashaei vice president in 2009, but he lasted only one week. What happened, and why the controversy?
            President Ahmadinejad appointed Mashaei as his first vice president on July 17, 2009 after the disputed June presidential election. The appointment angered many top clerics and other allies of Ahmadinejad. The appointment reportedly increased tensions within the administration. At one cabinet meeting, four ministers clashed with the president over Mashaei’s appointment. On July 24, Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei overruled Ahamdinejad’s appointment and Mashaei was forced to resign.
            The Iranian constitution states that the first vice president has the duty to lead cabinet meetings in the absence of the president. He also succeeds the president—with approval of the supreme leader—if the president dies or becomes incapable of performing his duties. Ahmadinejad’s critics suggested that the president was manipulating the post-election turmoil to insert his right-hand man into the center of power. In the end, however, Mashaei’s opponents had enough leverage to block his appointment. Ahmadinejad instead appointed Mashaei his chief of staff.
 
What is Mashaei’s relationship with Ahmadinejad, and why is the president so supportive of him?
            Mashaei has been viewed as a man surrounded by controversy, and his relationship with President Ahmadinejad has been an enigma to the president’s conservative allies. Ahmadinejad once said he had “a thousand reasons” to support Mashaei and that there was “no convincing” reason for the attacks on him. “One of the virtues and glories God has bestowed on me in life was to become acquainted with this great, honest, and pious man,” Adhmadinejad said.

What positions has Mashaei taken on Iran’s most critical domestic and foreign policy issues, such as negotiations over the nuclear program?
            Mashaei generally echoes the president’s views on Iran’s nuclear program. There is no sign of disagreement between them. But both men have distanced themselves from core fundamentalist policies in Iran, including the hejab (Islamic dress) and police crackdowns on styles of dress considered un-Islamic.
 

Kourosh Rahimkhani is an independent scholar specializing in Iranian affairs. He worked as a journalist for a number of reformist newspapers in Iran before moving to the United States.
 
 
Online news media are welcome to republish original blog postings from this website in full, with a citation and link back to The Iran Primer website (www.iranprimer.com) as the original source. Any edits must be authorized by the author. Permission to reprint excerpts from The Iran Primer book should be directed to permissions@usip.org
 

The Islamists Are Coming

The Islamists Are Coming, edited by Robin Wright, surveys the rise of Islamist groups in the wake of the Arab Spring. Often lumped together, the more than 50 Islamist parties with millions of followers now constitute a whole new spectrum—separate from either militants or secular parties. They will shape the new order in the world’s most volatile region more than any other political bloc. Yet they have diverse goals and different constituencies. Sometimes they are even rivals.

Connect With Us

Our Partners

Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars Logo