In  November 2012, Iran’s parliament suspended subsidy reform and is now  unlikely to allow “drastic increases” in the price of consumer staples  over the next year, according to a new report by Jahangir Amuzegar.  President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad launched a phased reform plan in 2010 that  was designed to cut back government subsidies of basic commodities  dating back to the 1980s. But the plummeting value of Iran’s  currency—now nearly 30,000 rials to the dollar, less than half  its  value just a year ago, could triple the price of staples such as wheat,  sugar and flour. 
             Price hikes could also have a rippling impact on Iran’s troubled  economy as well as politics just six months before a presidential  election. So the regime has opted to maintain subsidies at least for the  time being. The following are excerpts from the Middle East Economic  Survey by Amuzegar, a former member of the International Monetary Fund  Executive Board, followed by a link to the full text. 
            On 13 November 2012 the Islamic Republic’s Majlis (national assembly) voted to “suspend” the second phase of the Targeted Subsidies Reform Act  of January 2010 – thereby halting further price increases in public  utilities (food, fuel, water, electricity) and further rises in monthly  welfare cash payments to households during the current Persian year  (March 2012-March 2013). Thus a program that had been announced with the  greatest fanfare in December 2010 as the center-piece of President  Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s “Great Economic Surgery” (MEES, 24 November 2008)  came to an inglorious end with hardly a whisper…
The Program: From Birth to Suspension
           Since  coming to power in 1979, Iran’s Islamic government has been subsidizing  the production, consumption, distribution and export of various goods  and services. By the end of the first decade of the 21st  century, these public subsidies – both explicit (budgeted) and implicit  (ie foregone opportunity values) – had reached 25% of the gross domestic  product. While some of these subsidies (such as food and medicine)  played a useful role in raising child nutrition and reducing infant  mortality, as a whole they resulted in wasted resources, profligate  consumption, air and water pollution, environmental decay and the  continued use of outmoded technologies.
The urgent need for subsidy reforms was thus a matter of national consensus, because the status quo was intolerably costly, wasteful, unfair, counter-productive and altogether unsustainable…
The urgent need for subsidy reforms was thus a matter of national consensus, because the status quo was intolerably costly, wasteful, unfair, counter-productive and altogether unsustainable…
The Second Phase
           Claiming  that 70% of subsidies still remained to be “reformed,” President  Ahmadinejad told the press corps in early January 2012 that the second  phase of the program would start before the end of the Iranian year on  20 March 2012.  There were other signs that the government intended to  launch the second phase with even greater vigor. The Price Monitoring  Board intensified its surveillance of the market, and some $24bn was set  aside by the government to be used for stockpiling essential goods  during the year. In the first week of Iran’s new year (late March 2012),  a sum of IR280,000 was also deposited in the bank accounts of some  families for each of its individual members—reminiscent of the same  gesture before the first phase. Responding to widespread complaints by  the Iran Chamber of Commerce regarding the neglect of the production  sector, government officials promised to remedy the situation through  direct financial assistance, low-cost loans and price rise allowances…
What Next?
           The  Majlis’ November 2012 act only “suspends” the program’s second phase  and presumably does not terminate the reform initiative.  In fact, the  head of the Subsidies Reform Headquarters has told the press that the  government will shortly propose the resumption of the new phase in the  context of the forthcoming (2012-2013) fiscal budget, and hopes to reach  a satisfactory compromise with the legislature. Yet under the current  circumstances, the Subsidies Targeting scheme-- in its January 2010 form  – is to all intents and purposes dead. Given the current official inflation  rate of nearly 25% (caused mainly by excess domestic liquidity as well  as international sanctions), the banking system’s latest record of  non-performing loans and the growing current budget deficit, no prudent  legislature would dare allow further drastic increases in the price of  basic consumer staples. And given the rial’s dramatic devaluation (MEES,  6 August, 2012), the original statute would be nearly impossible to  carry out.  Under this act, the prices of gasoline and other subsidized  items were to be gradually raised to international levels (ie no less  than 90% of their fob prices on the Persian Gulf). With the dollar/rial  rate at the time of the legislation hovering around $1=IR10,000, the  five-year price adjustments required a four to five times increase in  the price of most items. Now, with the exchange rate nearing  $1=IR30,000, compliance with the act’s original provisions would require  a further threefold increase, which would be well-nigh prohibitive. Any  new subsidies reform initiative would therefore have to start from  scratch.
Click here for the full text.
